Recall that d was defined on the unit simplex, mapping it into a linear combination of higher dimensional simplexes in δn cross the unit interval I. This map d was then extended to any simplex v(δn) in the space S by applying v to d(δn):I. In other words, d and v commute by definition.
This time we are going to define d only for the 0 dimensional simplex. After that, we will prove that d exists, by induction, for each dimension.
The standard simplex in 0 dimensions is a point, and the box, δ0 cross I, is a segment of length 1. Let d map the point to the entire segment, which happens to be a 1-simplex. Thus d maps every 0-simplex in S to a 1-simplex in S:I.
Have a gander at bd+db. The boundary of a point disappears, taking one of the terms with it. Moving to the other term, apply d and get the segment x:I. The boundary is x:1 - x:0. This is precisely the relationship we expect from bd+db.
Let f implement a homotopy from S:I into T, as was done in the previous page. Let f0 be f restricted to S:0, and let f1 be f restricted to S:1. Push everything through f, and d has the desired property, at least in 0 dimensions. That is, bd+db = f1-f0.
We're ready for the inductive step. Assume d has been defined for all dimensions below n. Let q = δn:0 (the bottom), and let r = δn:1 (the top). We are trying to find d such that db = r - q - bd.
If the right side is the boundary of a linear combination of n+1 dimensional simplexes u, then set d(δn) = u, and we're done. We only need show the right side is a boundary.
The space δn cross I is comvex, hence it has trivial homology beyond h0. At each level, cycles and boundaries coincide. It is sufficient to prove r-q-bd is a cycle. Apply the boundary operator, and see if the result is 0.
b(r) - b(q) - b(d(b(δn)))
The boundary of δn lives in n-1 dimensions, where d is already defined. Apply the homotopy relationship at this level.
b(r) - b(q) - { r(b) - q(b) - d(b(b(δn))) }
Since boundary2 = 0, that term goes away.
b(r) - b(q) - { r(b) - q(b) }
The boundaries of q and r are well understood. In the context of the prior homotopy, q(b) is the boundary of the standard simplex run through q. This is the boundary of q. In the same way, r(b) is the boundary of the standard simplex, pushed up to r, which is the boundary of r. We're really saying boundary commutes with other continuous functions, which is true by definition. Therefore the entire expression drops to 0, and that completes the proof.
Specific homomorphisms dn have not been constructed for each dimension n, but the method of acyclic models proves these homomorphisms exist, whence homotopic functions induce the same homology homomorphisms.